ABSTRACT
In order to mitigate the inequities in health outcomes and healthcare access for vulnerable populations during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government of India introduced antigen-based SARS-CoV-2 self-testing kits for self-administered use. In this study, we aimed to determine the usability of these nasal-sampling-based self-tests in a peer-assisted model among factory workers in Bengaluru. The mixed-method cross-sectional study was conducted with 106 factory workers, spanning two sites from February to March 2022 in Bengaluru, India. Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Self-Test kit and the mobile application NAVICA for self-reporting results were used. A peer assistant distributed test kits, guided participants on conducting tests and using the app, and offered demonstrations with their own kit, ensuring no contact with the participants kits. Findings were encapsulated by an observer, who used standardized product-specific usability checklists and pictures of contrived results to assess the usability of the kit and mobile application, result interpretation, and the efficiency of peer instruction/demonstration. Additionally, a post-test survey and focus group discussions with selected participants and peer assistants were conducted to understand user perceptions of the facilitators and barriers to usability. Study findings show that the overall usability score of the test kit with peer assistance was 75.9%, rising to 80.7% for critical steps and 33.8% for all critical steps in uploading results through NAVICA. Additionally, it was seen that peer assistants provided accurate instructions and support for 93.4% of the tests. Among the critical steps in test kit use, maximum errors were made in sample collection and using the correct amount of buffer solution. Concordance between the participant and observer/NAVICA was 97.9%. 62.0% and 56.6% of the participants reported confidence in a) performing and interpreting the test and b) capturing and uploading their results using the mobile application with the assistance of a peer, respectively. Less than half the participants reported confidence in performing these steps independently. The study indicates that the COVID-19 nasal self-testing kit has good usability in factories peer-assisted workplace testing model. Such models can empower vulnerable worker groups to access early detection and self-care tools equitably.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
COVID-19 patients present higher risk for myocardial infarction (MI), acute coronary syndrome, and stroke for up to 1 year after SARS-CoV-2 infection. While the systemic inflammatory response to SARS-CoV-2 infection likely contributes to this increased cardiovascular risk, whether SARS-CoV-2 directly infects the coronary vasculature and attendant atherosclerotic plaques to locally promote inflammation remains unknown. Here, we report that SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA (vRNA) is detectable and replicates in coronary atherosclerotic lesions taken at autopsy from patients with severe COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 localizes to plaque macrophages and shows a stronger tropism for arterial lesions compared to corresponding perivascular fat, correlating with the degree of macrophage infiltration. In vitro infection of human primary macrophages highlights that SARS-CoV-2 entry is increased in cholesterol-loaded macrophages (foam cells) and is dependent, in part, on neuropilin-1 (NRP-1). Furthermore, although viral replication is abortive, SARS-CoV-2 induces a robust inflammatory response that includes interleukins IL-6 and IL-1{beta}, key cytokines known to trigger ischemic cardiovascular events. SARS-CoV-2 infection of human atherosclerotic vascular explants recapitulates the immune response seen in cultured macrophages, including proatherogenic cytokine secretion. Collectively, our data establish that SARS-CoV-2 infects macrophages in coronary atherosclerotic lesions, resulting in plaque inflammation that may promote acute CV complications and long-term risk for CV events
Subject(s)
Myocardial Infarction , Atherosclerosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Acute Coronary Syndrome , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome , COVID-19 , Stroke , InflammationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus pandemic confronted blood transfusion services with major challenges. The present study was conducted to explore the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood transfusion services including seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted and data on blood donation, utilization, camps, plateletpheresis and seroprevalence of transfusion-transmitted infections (TTI) was retrieved from software from March to September 2020 and 2021 and compared with corresponding time periods of three preceding non-pandemic years. RESULTS: There was a decline of 53.79% and 34.4% in blood donations in 2020 and 2021 respectively with a significant reduction in voluntary donations from 91.8% in the pre-pandemic period to 72.2% in 2020 and 77.7% in 2021. Replacement donors increased by 60.81% and 72.89% in 2020 and 2021 respectively. There was a decline of 48.4% in the number of plateletpheresis procedures in 2020 which increased in 2021 during the dengue outbreak. The decline in total blood donations and issue of packed red blood cells was statistically significant but supply and demand were balanced with no deficit. TTI seroprevalence increased from 1.01% to 1.49%(p<0.001) and 1.51%(p<0.001) in 2020 and 2021 respectively. Replacement donors showed a significantly higher TTI prevalence as compared to voluntary donors(p<0.001). A significant increase in prevalence was observed for Syphilis (0.4%) in 2020 and HBsAg (0.54%), HCV(0.63%) and syphilis (0.25%) in 2021. CONCLUSION: The potential consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on blood safety cannot be undermined. Developing a strong database of regular voluntary donors can be instrumental in dealing with future waves and surges in infections.
ABSTRACT
Background: The Impact of COVID-19 pandemic over non-essential health services has been massive. We initiated Influenza Like Illness (ILI) screening for resumption of out-patient services at a tertiary care centre and this study attempted to gauge its efficacy in effectively pruning out COVID-19. Methods: We included all the patients who had visited for an OPD appointment during the study period. Patient details and ILI symptoms were noted. Patients were then followed up telephonically after 2 weeks. The telephonic follow up was to ensure RT-PCR status and complaints of any newly developed ILI post OPD visit (within the last 14 days). Results: : Out of the 957 patients who were enrolled, 929 patients were successfully followed up telephonically after 14 days. Only 13 who were screened out as ‘possible ILI’, were either RT-PCR negative or did not follow up with a confirmatory test. The telephonic follow up to ensure RT-PCR status and complaints of any newly developed ILI post OPD visit (within the last 14 days) was noted in the rest of the patients. Only 1 participant out of 957 screened, tested positive for COVID-19. Conclusion: The period in which the study was held the national positivity rate was low (around 3%). Therefore, in a resource limited country such as India it is astute to restart the OPD services in the pre-existing setup using basic precautions and a verbal questionnaire during the slope of the pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19ABSTRACT
BackgroundQuarantine of healthcare workers (HCWs) exposed to COVID -19 confirmed cases is a well-known strategy for limiting the transmission of infection. However, there is need of evidence-based guidelines for quarantine of HCWs in COVID -19. MethodsWe describe our experience of contact tracing and risk stratification of 3853 HCWs who were exposed to confirmed COVID-19 cases in a tertiary health care institution in India. We developed an algorithm, on the basis of risk stratification, to rationalize quarantine among HCWs. Risk stratification was based on the duration of exposure, distance from the patient, and appropriateness of personal protection equipment (PPE) usage. Only high-risk contacts were quarantined for 14 days. They underwent testing for COVID-19 after five days of exposure, while low-risk contacts continued their work with adherence to physical distancing, hand hygiene, and appropriate use of PPE. The low-risk contacts were encouraged to monitor for symptoms and report for COVID-19 screening if fever, cough, or shortness of breath occurred. We followed up all contacts for 14 days from the last exposure and observed for symptoms of COVID-19 and test positivity. Results and interpretationOut of total 3853 contacts, 560 (14.5%) were categorized as high-risk contacts, and 40 of them were detected positive for COVID-19, with a test positivity rate of 7.1% (95% CI = 5.2 - 9.6). Overall, 118 (3.1%) of all contacts tested positive. Our strategy prevented 3215 HCWs from being quarantined and saved 45,010 person-days of health workforce until June 8, 2020, in the institution. We conclude that exposure-based risk stratification and quarantine of HCWs is a viable strategy to prevent unnecessary quarantine, in a healthcare institution. SummaryO_ST_ABSWhat is already known about this subject?C_ST_ABSO_LIQuarantine of HCWs is a well-known strategy for community and HCWs to prevent the transmission of COVID-19. C_LIO_LIThough success stories of prompt contact tracing and quarantine to control COVID-19 are available from countries like South Korea, Singapore, and Hong Kong, there is a scarcity of evidence that could guide targeted quarantine of HCWs exposed to COVID -19 in India. C_LI What does this study add?O_LIOnly 14.5% HCWs exposed to COVID-19 cases were stratified "high risk" contacts, and the most common reason for high-risk contacts was non-formal workplace interactions such as having meals together. C_LIO_LIThe overall test positivity rate among the high-risk contacts was 7.1%, while it was higher in symptomatic high-risk contacts as compared to those who were asymptomatic (10.2% vs. 6.3%). C_LI How might this impact on clinical practice?O_LIContact tracing and risk stratification can be used to minimize unnecessary quarantine of COVID-19 exposed health care workers and prevent the depletion of healthcare workers amidst the pandemic to continue the healthcare services optimally. C_LI